Another Canon (or Serenar) 50mm F1.5 LTM/LSM/m39 lens review

In this review, only the technical properties of the lens are investigated. Artistic abilities will be tested in the future, in a separate article.

After getting a new lens, I always take a few technical shots to understand its strengths and weaknesses – usually it helps me a lot to start using unknown lens with much less of doubt. One day I decided that my data might be interesting for someone else and this site has been made.

 

CanonLTM5015ext_78

Canon Camera Museum link

Canon 50mm F:1.5  (Serenar) parameters:

Marketed Nov-52
Original Price 36,500 yen
Lens Construction (group) 3
Lens Construction (element) 7
No. of Diaphragm Blades 13
Minimum Aperture 16 ?
Closest Focusing Distance (m) 1
Maximum Magnification (x)
Filter Diameter (mm) 40
Maximum Diameter x Length (mm)
Weight (g) 295

Additional information:

  • ‘This lens is developed based on Zonner 50mm f/1.5 manufactured by Carl Zeiss’ – quote from official materials.
  • Min focus distance = 3.5 feet
  • This lens arrived directly from Japan
  • Serial number of reviewed lens is 23918
  • Weight of reviewed lens is 271g
  • Optical and mechanical condition of this copy is very nice. There is nothing which can affect the images

 

As you can see, my scale displays weight equal 271g, but official site contains 296g. I’m sure in my scale so it can be production deviations or incorrect data on Canon Museum.


Lens exterior:

(Please, forgive me the dust on the lens, I never have the patience to clean objects for close-up photo sessions)

 


Lens code name – Natsuki Nakagawa  中川 夏紀

Natsuki Nakagawa (中川 夏紀 Nakagawa Natsuki) is a character in the Hibike! Euphonium series. She is a second year student who plays the euphonium. She becomes the band’s vice-president in her senior year.

 


Resolution – close distance:

Test description: target is a 10×15 cm picture (printed, glossy photo paper), fixed on the wall by scotch. Distance – about 50% longer than minimal focus distance marked on the lens. Camera Sony A7II (24mpx, full frame) was fixed on the tripod and managed remotely with computer display as a viewfinder. All groups of shots were repeated 9 times for every target position on all apertures from fully opened up to F16, ISO-100, WB – same for all shots. SteadyShot – OFF. Focus was manually corrected for each shot. After all needed shots have been taken for one target position – I moved  the target to the next place.

test_scene_view300x200

Main idea – to exclude the field curvature affect on so close distance.

Of course, I can’t be absolutely accurate, but so many repeats of shots – 4 for corners, 2 for long side, 2 for short side are giving me insurance that test results are correct.

Finally, pictures were converted from ARW-files in Capture One with default settings, cropped for 300×200 px elements, combined into diagrams and exported into JPEG-files.

Scene preview:

CanonLTM5015__scene_preview

Original target image (printed in horizontal orientation on 10cm X 15cm glossy photo paper)

nakagawa natsuki1print

Test results (selected version, easy to compare – 4 positions):

CanonLTM5015_SHORT

Test results (full version – all 9 positions):

CanonLTM5015_FULL


Resolution – long distance:

Test description: Camera Sony A7II (24mpx, full frame) was fixed on the tripod and managed remotely with computer display as a viewfinder. Targets (buildings) were fixed by gravity power on the distances in more than 200 meters. All shots have been taken with apertures from fully opened up to F16. ISO-100. Shutter Speed – depends on light (camera A-mode), WB – fixed and the same for all shots. SteadyShot – OFF. Focus was manually corrected for each shot to exclude focus-shift affect.

Finally, pictures were converted from ARW-files in Capture One with default settings (Some single files have a slight light correction, for better visual convenience in comparison), then were cropped for 300×200 px elements, combined into diagrams and exported into JPEG-files.

Scene preview:

Test results:


Vignetting:

(frames scaled – 300×200)

Canon5015_Vignetting


Geometric distortion:

(frame scaled 1200×800)

Canon5015LTM_giometry_57.jpg


Coma aberrations:

(100% crops – 300×200)

CanonLTM5015_coma_aberr_


Chromatic aberrations:

(100% crops – 300×200)


Close distance bokeh:

Test conditions: lens was focused on to minimal distance 1m, plants were fixed in 3m distance from camera in front of the window with bright light from outside.

(frame scaled 1200×800, bokeh covers the frame partially)

CanonS5015_bokeh_close_3crops


Long distance bokeh:

Test conditions: lens was focused on half distance on the scale (2m), houses were fixed in infinity distance on the ground.

(frame scaled 1200×800)

Canon5015_bokeh_far_5crops


Light dots bokeh:

Test conditions: lens was focused on to minimal distance 1m, diodes were  fixed in 3m distance at the dark background.

Note: a lot of similar tests with another 50mm lenses for same or close conditions are presented on the site, so you can compare easily. Please, read other articles.

(frame scaled 1200×800)

CanonS5015_dots_close_4crops


Light dots long distance bokeh:

Test conditions: lens was focused on to minimal distance 1m, lights were fixed in more than 200m.

Such scenes can’t be meet often, so this is demonstration of extreme conditions. In most cases of real life photography the blur level will be less.

(frame scaled 1200×800)

Canon5015LTM_dots_far.jpg


Another resources with tests and reviews:

japancamerahunter.com

klassik-cameras.de

antiquecameras.net


My overall conclusion about the Canon Serenar 50mm F1.5:

AvatarCanonLTM5015

Outstanding lens that has a poor technical result with an excellent artistic abilities. All photographers heard descriptions like ‘true vintage lense, great bokeh, beautiful softness, unbelievable rendition, bla-bla-bla’. This lens is ready for all such words in one time. Yes, Canon (or Serenar) 50mm F1.5 is one of the really legendary and famous lens in the world. Sometimes I think that it’s cheapest among the others legacies, so it can be written as number one in the long list of legends. On the other hand, it’s so bad technically that begins to draw ‘rendition’ everywhere in the frame except center, yes, right in the DOF. And the circle of sharpness is too small sometimes to use gold-selection with portraits. Lens isn’t good in fighting against any little front-light and gives a lot of softness even if closed for 2 stops. There is never enough sharpness in the corners for landscapes, even on F16. It looks like this lens has collected all known aberrations, and may be a couple of some new unknown. That’s the price for famous picture rendition. But I agree with idea that every photographer should try such a lens, because some photographers have never change it later.

Finally: lens with bad IQ but with unbelievable art possibilities. I believe that you will like it. Anyway, it can’t be the only lens in your toolbox, because it’s good for scenes where details can be sacrificed in favor of the bokeh, and for most usual scenes the more typical lens will be needed.


 

This lens took part in the battles:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s