LensWars: Minolta MD Zoom 75-150mm f/4.0 vs. MD 85mm f/2.0 vs. MD 135mm f/2.8

Comparison of lenses Minolta MD Zoom 75-150mm 1:4.0, Minolta MD 85mm 1:2.0 and Minolta MD 135mm 1:2.8. All lenses are New-MD generation (MDIII by collectors classification)

All fighters are optically in mint conditions.

This comparison is correct only for conditions and equipment used for tests. Test results can be differ if any element is changed.

Reviews:

MDZ75150_avatar.png


Test description: Camera Sony A7II (24mpx, full frame) was fixed on the tripod and managed remotely with computer display as a viewfinder. Targets (buildings) were fixed by gravity power on the distances in more than 200 meters. All shots were made with apertures from fully opened and up to F11. ISO-100. Shutter Speed – depends on light (camera A-mode). SteadyShot – OFF. Focus was manually corrected for each shot to exclude focus-shift. For excluding of any possible field curvatures affects – focus was set on the red rectangle for every of positions – center, middle, corner (see scene previews).

Finally, pictures were converted from ARW-files in Capture One with default settings, and with little WB correction (because weather changes). 300×200 px elements were cropped (100% crops), combined into diagrams and exported into JPEG-files.

As you know, Minolta’s N-MD series lenses haven’t “half-click” after the first aperture position, so I stop ring in the middle position, but it’s impossible to set it precisely, so, if you see that a picture taken, for example, with N-MD 35mm f/1.8 on aperture 2.0 – it means that picture was taken on aperture set in the middle position between 1.8 and 2.8. Same for N-MD 35mm f/2.8 with photo taken on f3.5.

Notes:
  • Sunlight has been changed during the session.
  • I am just a man, I do not pretend that in all cases my focus settings were absolutely accurate. But I aspired to it.

Focal distance 85mm


Scene preview (85mm):

MDZ75150_85mm__e_far_preview.jpg


Test results (85mm):

MDZ75150_MD8520_Battle.jpg


Focal distance 135mm


Scene preview (135mm):

MDZ75150_135mm__e_far_preview.jpg


Test results (135mm):

MDZ75150_MD13528_Battle.jpg


Conclusion, or what does it means?

Minolta MD Zoom 75-150mm 1:4 vs MD 85mm 1:2:

Pay attention to corners please. The zoom beats the prime closed for 3(!) stops. I have no words, it’s a magic. By the way – this Minolta MD 85mm F2.0 is in the pantheon of the best lenses of Minolta ever made.

In the Center and Middle positions prime has a little advantage, but microscope is needed to see it.

As result: MD 75-150/4 totally wins from the sharpness point of view. But, of course, MD 85/2 would be preferable if fast apertures are needed – it also has amazing resolution in corners, just may be not so amazing as MD 75-150/4.

Minolta MD Zoom 75-150mm 1:4 vs MD 135mm 1:2.8:

One of the best 135mm lenses – Minolta MDIII 135/2.8 – has not lost a single battle. But this fight was not easy even for such a famous fighter. Both lenses are the same. It looks that zoom has a little bit more contrast, but in details differences are too small to talk about it. Draw, both are winners.

But again: one stop slower zoom-lens shows the same resolution as prime on similar  apertures? I just can recommend not to sold it if you got it.

MDZ75150_MD8520_MD13528_Battle__Avatar.png


 

4 thoughts on “LensWars: Minolta MD Zoom 75-150mm f/4.0 vs. MD 85mm f/2.0 vs. MD 135mm f/2.8”

  1. I’ve always found strange that while everyone usually talks about the 35-70/3.5 and the 80-210/4 when it comes to Minolta zooms, just a few by comparison people know of the existence of the 75-150/4. I have a bunch of Minolta primes and zooms (but I’m not even close to your collection) and I must say that I really love the 75-150/4 because optically it’s a gem of a vintage zoom. The cherry on top is that this focal range is useful even with the crop factor of APS-C sensors, furthermore it’s capable of a great performance even on demanding sensors with an high pixel density (24mp APS-C or 42mp FF). By the way I really enjoy your blog 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thank you for support )) To be honestly, I don’t keep all lenses which are reviewed, just some of them. To my regret I’ve sold my 70-210/4 earlier than this site was started and don’t have materials for full article, but samples on infinity distance were saved and I can see that 70-210/4 isn’t so good as this 75-150/4, especially in corners

    Like

  3. hello from Paris !
    your blog is really good and I enjoy it..I confirm that 75-150 is really good (smaller and lighter than 70-210) .
    I also own some lens from Minolta (about 25)..If I should keep only one, it would be the 35-105 lens: it’s lighter and smaller than the 35-135..my advice : get it 😉

    Like

  4. Hello, Mersi for the advance)) 35-105 is in plans for next reviews, may be not soon but this lens should be tested. After the results of 35-135 – I can predict that it has nice IQ

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.